Image courtesy of digitalart FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
We decided she and her companion were on a first date.
“How are they doing?” asked my husband, who couldn’t glance
their way as sneakily as I could. (We, old-marrieds, often try to send good
vibes to people on awkward first dates in restaurants.)
“She looks super-uncomfortable,” I reported. She hunched
over, as if she were trying to fold up on herself, her back exposed, her legs pressed tightly together.
Unlike her date, who wore khakis, she was, my husband
pointed out, half-naked and probably cold. She also had a hard time walking in her shoes.
I have always been anti-dress. Yes, I’ll wear one if I
have to (to a wedding, for example), but I find dresses and skirts and their
accompanying shoes to be uncomfortable and impractical. I wonder about the
parochial schools that, to this day, insist that girls wear skirts as part of
their uniforms, claiming they are more “modest.” Meanwhile, the girls wear
bicycle shorts under those skirts so they don’t have to worry about exposing their
underpants.
I was surprised to learn that, according to this Wikipedia entry,
it wasn’t until 1972 that it became illegal for public schools to require girls
to wear dresses, well within my lifetime.
Sure, once, both genders wore dress-like garments, like
togas, but that was because they didn’t have the means to make more complicated
clothes. Some point out that dresses made it easier for a woman living in the
wilderness to relieve herself, but, I ask you, when was the last time you had
to pee outside?
My little-kid self was right: dresses suck.